Info!
UPDATED 1 Sept: The EI library in London is temporarily closed to the public, as a precautionary measure in light of the ongoing COVID-19 situation. The Knowledge Service will still be answering email queries via email , or via live chats during working hours (09:15-17:00 GMT). Our e-library is always open for members here: eLibrary , for full-text access to over 200 e-books and millions of articles. Thank you for your patience.
UPDATED 1 Sept: The EI library in London is temporarily closed to the public, as a precautionary measure in light of the ongoing COVID-19 situation. The Knowledge Service will still be answering email queries via email , or via live chats during working hours (09:15-17:00 GMT). Our e-library is always open for members here: eLibrary , for full-text access to over 200 e-books and millions of articles. Thank you for your patience.
Reduce emissions from dehydration units. H.O. Ebeling, L.G. Lyddon and K.K. Covington. Hydrocarbon Processing, April 1999, 78(4), 107--116.
Selecting the proper dehydrating agent is important for controlling emissions from glycol dehydration units. Use of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) is recommended for ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol systems. Economic evaluations compare glycol regeneration designs against other abatement technologies. Glycol selection criteria are reviewed for removing volatile organic compounds to meet legislative requirements of 10 tons/yr for any pollutant and 25 tons/yr of total pollutants. Two case histories are reviewed and the operation for various glycol dehydration units is described and illustrated. Operating costs are discussed. 7 refs.
Abstract details
Journal title: Hydrocarbon Processing
Subjects: Environmental protection, Protection of ambient air and climate, Banking, finance and investment, Economics, business and commerce, Refining, Pollutants
