Info!
UPDATED 1 Sept: The EI library in London is temporarily closed to the public, as a precautionary measure in light of the ongoing COVID-19 situation. The Knowledge Service will still be answering email queries via email , or via live chats during working hours (09:15-17:00 GMT). Our e-library is always open for members here: eLibrary , for full-text access to over 200 e-books and millions of articles. Thank you for your patience.

Upstream industry’s shift towards ‘volume plays’ Wood Mackenzi ...

Upstream industry’s shift towards ‘volume plays’ Wood Mackenzie’s latest upstream report - Maintaining the pursuit of upstream value - has estimated that the remaining worth of international oil company (IOC) upstream portfolios is just over $2.6tn, shared between over 650 companies and 80 countries. In pursuit of further growth, there has been a clear shift towards ‘volume plays’ - characterised by huge reserves and comparatively low contractor margins, the report found. Head of Middle East and Asia-Pacific Upstream Research, Iain Brown, says: ‘There is huge remaining growth potential and volume plays are becoming increasingly important to IOCs’ value propositions. Companies are facing the prospect of lower margins, as they seek to produce oil and gas from more difficult and less accessible reservoirs. That may be oil sands or tight gas in North America, low margin oil in Iraq or Abu Dhabi, or sour gas in remote parts of the Far East.’ The report attributes one-third of total value to the five largest international companies - Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP and Total. Shell and ExxonMobil have the most valuable portfolios, estimated at around $220bn, although the top five IOCs still lag behind the world’s major national oil companies (NOCs), such as Saudi Aramco, PetroChina and Gazprom. Brown says: ‘Some NOCs have broadened their horizons in the last 20 years, successfully competing with their international counterparts. They are now regular, front-line competitors in the world’s major oil and gas provinces, adding to the access challenge for valuable new projects and acquisitions.’ Future expectations of value are dominated by three historical heartlands of oil and gas production - the US, Canada and Russia. The prominence of these countries is the result of three key factors - the scale of resource, political stability and, at least in regard to the US and Canada, fiscal terms which promote development of new production capacity. There is a clear relationship between the scale of a country’s remaining oil and gas reserves, and the upstream value proposition for IOCs. The Netherlands and the UK are advancing towards resource depletion, but deliver higher values to investors (over $12/b). By contrast, Russia and Libya, with tens of billions of barrels nominally accessible to IOCs, offer less than $3.5/b. Brown explains: ‘Cutting-edge technologies are needed to extract the difficult oil and gas towards the latter stages of field life, or from more challenging reservoirs. Countries in these circumstances tend to offer more attractive terms to attract essential skills and investment to extend production life.’ In conclusion, Brown says: ‘The upstream industry is evolving rapidly, but change is nothing new for international companies and many opportunities remain for value creation. Investors recognise that the opportunity set is constantly evolving and the shift to “volume plays” is already under way.’
Please login to save this item