Info!
UPDATED 1 Sept: The EI library in London is temporarily closed to the public, as a precautionary measure in light of the ongoing COVID-19 situation. The Knowledge Service will still be answering email queries via email , or via live chats during working hours (09:15-17:00 GMT). Our e-library is always open for members here: eLibrary , for full-text access to over 200 e-books and millions of articles. Thank you for your patience.

Shell forecast to spend $1.5bn in UK decommissioning through to 2025

Decorative image New

Shell is estimated to have over $3bn in total abandonment and decommissioning liability (ABEX) in producing UK oil and gas developments, stacking above fellow UK operators Apache, Total, ExxonMobil and BP, according to GlobalData.

The company’s latest research reveals that Shell is set to have the largest ABEX liability, of just over $3bn to abandon producing fields in the UK, and is set to spend as much as half of that value by 2025. This is driven mainly by the Brent oil field but also relates to expenditure in aging developments such as Pierce and Curlew.

Daniel Rogers, Upstream Oil & Gas Analyst at GlobalData, comments: ‘The total plug and abandonment (P&A) expenditure alone for the Brent field could reach $900mn and spans from 2008 to 2020 with over 150 wells in total. The decision not to remove the Brent gravity-based concrete structures weighing around 960,000 tonnes due to technical and safety concerns will come with significant cost savings; the decision, however, is being largely disputed by environmentalists and neighbouring countries.’

The two producing fields identified to carry the largest ABEX in the UK are the Brent and Forties oil developments. The combined ABEX for the two fields could reach some $4bn in total, with Brent expected to cease production in 2020 and Forties decomm not likely until the 2030s.

Daniel continues: ‘Despite the Forties Production System (FPS) pipeline not being due for abandonment in the near future, the removal of approximately 150,000 tonnes of platforms at the field could cost the participants some $700mn. This will weigh heavily on current operator Apache and, as a result, places the company only behind Shell in terms of UK abandonment and decommissioning liabilities from producing assets.’

The study also reveals a significant growth in the number of UK asset retirement contracts issued since the industry downturn in 2014, but the number has remained relatively flat since 2016 after a sharp initial rise. Of those contracts, the majority have been P&A work scopes, with near-term forecast UK ABEX expected to be weighted towards P&A activities.

Daniel adds: ‘We have seen a negative correlation between the number of asset retirement contracts awarded and the price of oil over the last five years. During lower oil prices, reduced profits from producing fields coupled with lower service costs provide a favourable environment for asset retirement activity. Given the recent stabilisation of the oil price and a push by the UK government to maximise economic recovery from existing assets, the outcome will likely lead to project abandonment delays and rejuvenated investment at legacy fields.’

Figure 1: Estimated abandonment and decommissioning expenditure (ABEX) breakdown of the Brent and Forties fields
Source: GlobaData

News Item details


Journal title: Petroleum Review

Countries: UK -

Subjects: Decommissioning

Please login to save this item